RISK AND EXPOSURE CONTROL OF AVIATION IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Till now the exposure analysis and assessment are put in fundament of the system of environment protection from human activities including the civil aviation. Risk methodology is considered mostly as supplemental tool for this. All the environmental hazards are subject of occupational (or transportation) safety at the same moment. The risks and of their impact on human and ecological (ecosystems) health is more valuable assessment than simply an exposure analysis, for example, a number of people annoyed by noise is more informative value than a number of exposed by noise (over or equal to specific level) people or simply an area of exposed by noise (of specific level) lands in vicinity of the airport under consideration. In comparison with noise annoyance, for which higher exposure provides higher number of annoyed people inside exposed community, for other types of risk agents the severity of health changes is also evident – up to cancer (for example, leukemia may be caused by electro-magnetic field exposure to people) or direct mortality outcomes. So, individual and societal risks are becoming more attractive values for decision making process in a number of practical cases of environment protection, in aviation sector also. To confirm this quite evident now precondition it is important to mention that a vulnerability of the human or/and eco-system under consideration is important to be assessed correctly, in a number of cases the vulnerability is possible to be controlled (not only the exposure of the noise or other factor being controlled!) to reach a final result of protection from a hazard(s). For example, considering noise annoyance, a complementary to Balanced Approach to aircraft noise management the community engagement is recommended (ICAO Cir. 351).For this was launched EU H-2020 project ANIMA (Aviation Noise Impact Management through Novel Approaches) for this to find the better communication solutions between exposed by noise community and authorities responsible for noise management.
Article Details
References
Zaporozhets, O., Blyukher, B. (2018), Risk Methodology to Assess and Control Aircraft Noise Impact in Vicinity of the Airports, “Sustainable Aviation”, Chapter 2Editors T. Hikmet Karakoc, C. Ozgur Colpan, Onder Altuntas, Yasin Sohret, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp. 37-79.
Babisch, W. (2002),The noise/stress concept, risk assessment and research needs, Noise Health, No. 4, pp. 1-11.
MP 2.1.10.0061-12. Risk assessment for the health of the population under exposure to variable electromagnetic fields (up to 300 ghz) in the conditions of population. methodical recommendations - M.: Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2012, 35 p. (In Russian).
Berglund, B. et al. (1999), Guidelines for Community Noise. World Health Organization, revised version, 141 p.
Birkmann, J. ed. (2013), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies (second editions). United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris. 688 pp.
Van Westen, C. J., Greiving, S. (2017), Multi-hazard risk assessment and decision making,Environmental hazards Methodologies for Risk Assessment and Management, Dalezios, N. R. (ed.), pp. 31-94.
Zaporozhets, O.I., Khaidar, H.A. (2001), Instruments and procedures for management of aviation safety provision. Visnyk of the National Aviation University, Kyiv, Iss. 6, No 1, pp. 186-189.
Basner, M. (2014),Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health, Lancet. Apr 12; 383(9925): pp. 1325–1332.
EPA (1973) Public Health and Welfare Criteria for Noise. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC), Rpt . EPA550/9-73-002, Washington, D.C.
Fidell, S., Piersons, K.S. (1997), Community response to environmental noise, in: M. J. Crocker (ed.) Encyclopedia of acoustics, New York: Wiley, Vol. 2, Charter 89, pp. 1083-1091.
Stallen, P. J. M. (1999), A theoretical framework for environmental noise annoyance. Noise Health, 1(3), pp.69-80.
ISO 1996-1 (2016). Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental sound—Part 1: Basic Quantities and assessment procedures, International Standard ISO 1996-1:2016 (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016), 11 p.
Schomer P.D. (2005), Criteria for assessment of noise annoyance. Noise Control Eng. J. 53 (4), 2005 Jul–Aug, p. 132-44.
UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction (2009), Published by the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), Geneva, Switzerland, May 2009. – 35 p.