THE METHOD OF RANKING EFFECTIVE PROJECT SOLUTIONS IN CONDITIONS OF INCOMPLETE CERTAINTY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The subject of research in the article is the process of ranking options in support systems for project decision-making under conditions of incomplete certainty. The goal of the work is to increase the efficiency of technologies for automated design of complex systems due to the development of a combined method of ranking effective options for building objects in conditions of incomplete certainty of input data. The following tasks are solved in the article: analysis of the current state of the problem of ranking options in support systems for project decision-making; decomposition of problems of system optimization of complex design objects and support of project decision-making; development of a variant ranking method that combines the procedures of lexicographic optimization and cardinal ordering in conditions of incomplete certainty of input data. The following methods are used: systems theory, utility theory, optimization, operations research, interval and fuzzy mathematics. Results. According to the results of the analysis of the problem of supporting project decision-making, the existence of the problem of correctly reducing subsets of effective options for ranking, taking into account factors that are difficult to formalize and the experience of the decision-maker (DM), was established. Decomposition of the problems of system optimization of complex design objects and support for project decision-making was carried out. For the case of ordinalistic presentation of preferences between local criteria, an estimate of the size of the rational reduction of subsets of optimal and suboptimal options for each of the indicators is proposed. Its use allows for one approach to obtain a subset of effective variants of a given capacity for analysis and final selection of the DM. A method of transforming the ordinalistic presentation of preferences between local criteria to their quantitative presentation in the form of weighting coefficients is proposed. Conclusions. The developed methods expand the methodological foundations of the automation of processes supporting the adoption of multi-criteria project decisions. They make it possible to correctly reduce the set of effective alternatives in conditions of incomplete certainty of the input data for the final choice, taking into account factors that are difficult to formalize, knowledge and experience of ODA. The practical use of the obtained results will allow to reduce the time and capacity complexity of the procedures for supporting project decision-making, and due to the use of the technology of selection of subsets of effective options with intervally specified characteristics - to guarantee the quality of project decisions and to provide a more complete assessment of them.
Article Details
References
Lutsenko, V. and Progonov, D. (2023), “Determining quality indicators for projects of information protection of information activity objects”, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, vol. 6, no. 2 (126), pp. 41–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.291616
Okwu, M.O. and Tartibu, L.K. (2021), Metaheuristic Optimization: Nature-Inspired Algorithms Swarm and Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications”, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 927, 196 р., doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61111-8
Martyn, Y., Liaskovska, S., Gregus, M., Izonin, I. and Velyka, O. (2021), “Optimization of Technological’s Processes Industry 4.0 Parameters for Details Manufacturing via Stamping: Rules of Queuing Systems”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 191, pp. 290–295, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.036
Malea, C.I. and Nitu, E.L. (2020), “Optimization of the technological process and equipment of complex profiled parts”, ModTech IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 916 012058, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/916/1/012058
Beskorovainyi, V. and Russkin, V. (2021), “Directed search of variants in technologies for reengineering of corporate computer networks”, Intelligent information systems for decision support in project and program management, Collective monograph, edited by I. Linde, ISMA, Riga, pp. 15–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/MMP.2021.015
Beskorovainyi, V., Kuropatenko, O. and Gobov, D. (2019), “Optimization of transportation routes in a closed logistics system”, Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, no. 4 (10), pp. 24–32, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2019.10.024
Yelizyeva, A., Artiukh, R. and Persiyanova, E. (2019), “Target and system aspects of the transport infrastructure development program”, Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, no. 3(9), pp. 81–90, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2019.9.081
Beskorovainyi, V. and Sudik, A. (2021), “Optimization of topological structures of centralized logistics networks in the process of reengineering”, Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, no. 1 (15), pp. 23–31, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2021.15.023
Beskorovainyi, V.V., Petryshyn, L.B. and Shevchenko O.Yu. (2020), “Specific subset effective option in technology design decisions”, Applied Aspects of Information Technology, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 443–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.15276/aait.01.2020.6
Akram, M. and Alcantud, J.C.R. (2023), Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods with Bipolar Fuzzy Sets, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0569-0
Huang, Z., Yue, H. and He, Q. (2023), “Research on uncertain multiple attribute decision making based on improved possibility degree relation model and its application”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 123, part B. 106349, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai. 106349
Wen, X. (2023), “Weighted hesitant fuzzy soft set and its application in group decision making”, Granular Computing, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00387-w
Stewart, R.H., Palmer, T.S. and DuPont, B. (2021), “A survey of multi-objective optimization methods and their applications for nuclear scientists and engineers”, Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 138, 103830, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103830
Drobintsev, P., Voinov, N., Kotlyarova, L., Selin, I. and Aleksandrova, O. (2019), “Optimization of Technological Processes at Production Sites Based on Digital Modeling”, Advanced Manufacturing and Automation IX. IWAMA, vol. 634, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2341-0_75
Yizhe Xu, Y., Yan, Ch., Huifang Liu, Wang, J., Yang, Z. and Jiang, Y. (2020), “Smart energy systems: A critical review on design and operation optimization”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 62, 102369, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102369
Raadsen, M.P.H., Bliemer, M.C.J. and Bell, M.G.H. (2020), “Aggregation, disaggregation and decomposition methods in traffic assignment: historical perspectives and new trends”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 139, pp. 199–223, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.06.008
Beskorovainyi, V. and Іmanhulova, Z. (2017), “Тechnology of large-scale objects system optimization”, ECONTECHMOD, vol. 06, no. 4, pp. 3–8, available at: https://www.osp.ru/os/2012/08/13019237
Beskorovainyi, V.V., Petryshyn, L.B. and Honcharenko, V.О. (2022), “Mathematical models of a multi-criteria problem of reengineering topological structures of ecological monitoring networks”, Applied Aspects of Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.15276/aait.05.2022.1
Beskorovainyi, V. (2020), “Combined method of ranking options in project decision support systems”, Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, no 4 (14), pp. 13–20, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2020.14.013
Kaliszewski, I., Kiczkowiak, T. and Miroforidis, J. (2016), “Mechanical design, Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Pareto optimality gap”, Engineering Computations, vol. 33(3), pp. 876–895, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-03-2014-0065
Liu, P. (2023), “Decision-making and Utility Theory”, AEMPS, vol. 26, pp. 313–321, doi: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/26/20230590
Saaty, T.L. (2016), “The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making”, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, vol. 233, pp. 363–419, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_10
Figueira, J., Mousseau, V. and Roy, B. (2016), “ELECTRE Methods”, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, vol. 233, pp. 155–185, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_5
Brans, J.P. and De Smet, Y. (2016), “PROMETHEE Methods Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis”, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, vol. 233, pp. 187–219, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6
Papathanasiou, J. and Ploskas, N. (2018), “TOPSIS. Multiple Criteria Decision Aid” Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Cham: Springer, vol. 136, pp. 1–30, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91648-4
Shmatko, O., Kolomiitsev, O., Rekova, N., Kuchuk, N. and Matvieiev, O. (2023), “Designing and evaluating dl-model for vulnerability detection in smart contracts”, Advanced Information Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 41–51, doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2023.4.05
Beskorovainyi, V., Kolesnyk, L. and Russkin, V. (2022), “Decision making support under conditions of incomplete consistency of expert advantages”, Innovative integrated computer systems in strategic project management, Collective monograph, edited by I. Linde, ISMA, Riga pp. 16–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/MMP.2022.016
Kovalenko, A. and Kuchuk, H. (2022), “Methods to Manage Data in Self-healing Systems”, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 425, pp. 113–171, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96546-4_3
Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. and Pham, U. (2021), “Decision-making under interval uncertainty revisited”, Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, vol. 5(1), pp. 79–85, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-07-2020-0030
Dotsenko, N., Chumachenko, I., Galkin, A., Kuchuk, H. and Chumachenko, D. (2023), “Modeling the Transformation of Configuration Management Processes in a Multi-Project Environment”, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 15(19), 14308, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914308
Stefanini, L. and Arana-Jimenez, M. (2019), “Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for interval and fuzzy optimization in several variables under total and directional generalized differentiability”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 362, pp. 1–34, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.04.009
Dubnitskiy, V., Kobylin, A., Kobylin, O., Kushneruk, Yu. and Khodyrev, A. (2023), “Calculation of harrington function (desirability function) values under interval determination of its arguments”, Advanced Information Systems, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 71–81. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2023.1.12
Stefanini, L., Guerra, M.L. and Amicizia, B. (2019), “Interval Analysis and Calculus for Interval-Valued Functions of a Single Variable. Part I: Partial Orders, gH-Derivative”, Monotonicity. Axioms, vol. 8, no. 4, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8040113
Beskorovainyi, V., Kolesnyk, L. and Chinwi, Mgbere (2023), “Mathematical models for determining the Pareto front for building technological processes options under the conditions of interval presentation of local criteria”, Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, no. 2 (24), pp. 16–26, doi: https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2023.24.016